comments Written By: Scott Jangro
April 26, 2005

People Lie. Another Look at the Cookie Scare

I read a whitepaper a week ago from Atlas titled “Is the Sky Falling on Cookies?” by Young-Bean Song, Director of Analytics & Atlas Institute. I was going to wait until it was available on the Atlas Institute Insights website before writing about it in case it wasn’t publicly available yet, but Brad Waller wrote about it, so I guess it’s fair game.

This whitepaper is a follow up on a story by Jupiter Research entitled, Measuring Unique Visitors: Addressing the Dramatic Decline in the Accuracy of Cookie-Based Measurement where they report, among other things that “as many as 39% of online users may be deleting cookies from their primary computer monthly, undermining the usefulness of cookie-based measurement and leaving many site operators flying blind.”

This story caused a flurry of responses, message board discussions, and blogs (Jeff Molander,
MarketingVox
, Linda Buquet, and Shawn Collins to name a few…)

Anyway, the Atlas story presented a different angle that what people say is not necessarily what they do. People lie.
Reminds me of the TV show House, where Dr. House and his band of young sexy docs can’t to solve the case until they realize that their patient is lying to them about their condition or history.

This just in…the sky isn’t falling
According to the Song, while the various studies show that 39 - 55% of users report to delete cookies at least monthly, the actual behavior is much different. For example, Song reports that the users who report to delete their cookies weekly actually delete their cookies on average every 47 days. And it goes up from there. Brad posted more numbers in his story.

Granted, it’s in Atlas’ best interest to downplay these reports. But it is a plausible story. Just look in the mirror.

What’s Going on Here?
Well, it seems that it’s become fashionable to delete cookies. Or at least it’s shameful to admit that you allow yourself to be tracked online. “Cookies? Pure evil. Of course I delete them. Every week. Yeah.”

I remember a discussion several years ago with an executive (a technical one) from a certain affiliate marketing company I used to work for. He told me that he had his computer rigged to automatically take care of the cookie deletion process. Ironic, huh? Was that really just braggadocio?

Why did cookies get such a bad reputation? And how did they get so much attention? Do you think if they were called, “persistent website memory” instead of sharing a name with a delicious snack, a word that every child learns from year-one (it was my first word), they would get such mainstream attention?

And what’s the big deal anyway? So what if some marketing companies can associate my online being with several other websites that I’ve visited. What are they going to do with it? Show me a relevent advertisement? I’ll take that over erectile disfunction emails any day. And I wonder how many of these people who (say they) delete cookies routinely happily plunk down their American Express card everywhere they possibly can. Do they think AMEX isn’t keeping track? Think again. At least Amex is smart enough to not name their tracking technology after something yummy.

Delete cookies? Bah. Personally, I think they’re pretty damn cool and that the internet would suck without them.

Viewing 2 Comments

    • ^
    • v
    Even more interesting, Scott, is the latest news. More than 3/4 of users say they know what cookies are, but only three out of 10 can accurately define cookies according to a study by Insight Express (an actual un-biased party it would appear). It was based on an April online survey of 800 Internet users and interviews with 300 participants.

    Here's another amazing piece of information that snaps things into perspective: Why do consumers delete cookies? The most popular reason, cited by 77 percent of the respondents, was to free up disk space (doh! that's a pretty dumb reason considering how much space even tens of thousands of cookies consume), while 67 percent said they did so to protect privacy and prevent tracking (All they see is numbers and Web sites; yet people freely tell large corporations exactly what they buy, how often, where, when and for what price via charge cards and "discount" grocery cards... go figure!). Other common reasons included deleting spyware/adware, cited by 57 percent of respondents; making the computer run faster (57 percent); and because it was recommended that they do so (51 percent). Run faster? Where did this myth come from? That's right, spyware and adware and so far as consumers are concerned no cookies = no spyware = faster machine.
    • ^
    • v
    That is interesting Jeff.

    One source of this myth seems to be technical support and internal computer helpdesk and IT folks. When there is a problem with a browser or website, "clean out your cookies" seems to be near the top of the list of things to try.

    Sure, it does make sense when troubleshooting a specific website problem. Start with a clean slate. You cannot troubleshoot without a known environment. I spent 10 years in technical support and I've recklessly killed more than my share of cookies.

    But somehow, these users are getting left with the impression that this is some sort of magical cure-all. Something's awry? The pavlovian zombies must...clean...out...cookies. Did it help anything? Probably not. Was there any immediate negative result of this? Nope. OK then, at least my computer's clean. Whatever that means.

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus