Google's Double Standards?

posted by jangro on (5 years, 11 months ago)

Let's talk about something other than CJ Javascript links for a bit...

Recently, Google updated their Webmaster Quality Guidelines to add a second bullet aimed toward affiliates. Peter Figueredo at Revenues writes that Google Only Wants Affiliates Who "Add Value" and talks about this change (second bullet, bold added):

  • Avoid "doorway" pages created just for search engines, or other "cookie cutter" approaches such as affiliate programs with little or no original content.
  • If your site participates in an affiliate program, make sure that your site adds value. Provide unique and relevant content that gives users a reason to visit your site first.

Among many comments, worthy of a read, Jimmy Daniels responds:

This coming from a site that just lists other sites for people to visit. Kettle meet pot, pot meet kettle.

and today Terry at SuperAff.com complains:

Google itself is a type of doorway or ‘thin’ page. A doorway page is basically a page where the sole purpose is to drive traffic to another website. It has little to no original or unique content. We go to a search engine to find a variety of results it has ’scraped’ or ‘copied’ from other websites and we click off from those results to a ‘real’ website.

and

Oh me oh my, flash thought: That sounds exactly like Google’s Froogle! I wonder what the value add is for this particular datafeed driven site

First, let me say that I have no love for Google. I understand the bitterness. I've had my fair share of getting kicked in the balls by the google boot.

Here's the thing. Sure, Google's site is "thin" of unique content. However, Google's not trying to get their own thin sites listed in natural SERPS, theirs or others. Take a look at their robots.txt.

I don't think Google really cares what sorts of thin sites you might create. They just don't want them in their index. Isn't that their prerogative? If you want to be in their index, you need to play by their rules. Though unfortunately, rule #1 is "don't share the rules," and #2 is "change the rules often".

Even so, congrats to Terry for her newly declared approach of critical thinking and saying "screw Google". If you don't live and die by Google and other search engine traffic, it's much easier to sleep at night.


Comments & Reactions

  • jangro saved this to Search Engines 5 years, 11 months ago
  • jangro saved this to Affiliate Marketing 5 years, 11 months ago
  • Posted by Michael Coley 5 years, 11 months ago

    I see this argument often, but I disagree with it. Google DOES add value, otherwise millions of people wouldn't use it every day.

    If affiliates built sites that added value, they wouldn't care as much whether Google indexed them or not. Those are the types of sites Google (and other search engines) WANT to list. Having SERPs with thousands of virtually identical Amazon affiliate sites adds absolutely no value to the user.

  • Posted by Baslubbers 5 years, 10 months ago

    Google is surely having their share of problems with them admitting that the site: query is broken!

  • Posted by Kun Dang 4 years, 8 months ago

    Well at the end of the day, with Google being the market leaders, they can and does pretty much get away with everything.

    Just how the world works really.


Leave a comment


Comment via Facebook

Listed Under

Reactions

Tags
    This item hasn't been tagged.