Affiliate Links in Twitter, Amazon Says No

by Scott Jangro on 07 July 2009

We’ve been around the block a time or two about whether twitter is an appropriate place to post affiliate links.

Most of the affiliate networks prohibit the posting of affiliate links in forums, blog comments, etc.; in other words, you cannot post (read spam) affiliate links on sites that you do not own.

As we discussed the topic of affiliate links in twitter, this issue occurred to me. Since people don’t “own” twitter, does that fall into the above categories. In my mind, it doesn’t as I consider twitter a blogging platform that’s no different from blogger or other hosted blogging solutions in this context. I even asked someone from the network quality team at one of the networks and they agreed with me on that.

However, surprisingly enough, Amazon differs on this. Amazon Associate, Joshua Odmark reported on Search Engine Journal that Amazon slashed his commissions from amazon links that he posted on his Twitter and Facebook accounts. Why? They cited their terms that links must be posted on “Your Site”.

It seems that they take the “Your Site” distinction pretty seriously.

What’s not entirely clear to me is whether it’s that they object to Twitter and Facebook specifically, or just that these links were not posted on the site that was on the application.

And would they accept these sites in an application? I guess this would also exclude sending someone a referral link in email? That’s not “Your Site” either.

Joshua hasn’t been able get any sort of explanation out of Amazon. I’ll be keeping an eye on this one.

amazon agreement.png

  • Yeah I agree with Amazon, it's just a spam prevention method, affiliate marketers should have their own websites anyways.
  • Mike Stanislaus
    It's better practice to bring people to your landing page anyway. It's not a big deal to make a blogpost and then let people go from there.
  • PC Repair
    I am sorry but I must agreed with Amazon.  If we were allowed to post affiliate links anywhere, it would be just like spaming and anyone will do start doing it.  That is way you have to own a website or blog, is like a recommendation from your site and even more thrustful.  Personally I wouldn't like to have affiliate links on my sites that I didin't approved.
  • Henrik B
    That sure is a grey line for sure, it seems ridiculous, that Amazon won’t let us make money for them, unless it’s “our site”….
  • There're a good and bad point from this Amazon agreement.
    IMHO, If they create an affiliate program, that means that they're looking for more sales which is generate more income for them. Why they just don't let the affiliate persons do their job and they handle the rest. Advertiser will get more sales, affiliate person will generate more income, both of us made profit, that's a win win solution.

    The good point is, as an advertiser, vendor, they get more specific targetted buyers and eliminate a lot of any fakes, spam visitors
  • I hate spammers anyways nice article thanks for sharing
  • I don't know why companies like Amazon don't like direct linking to their products, if it sells why not they pay us commission when somenone actually buy something and not pay per click ...

    Roger
  • Yes no more spammy followers!
  • I actually dislike to use my tweety for comercial purpose. So, I agree with amazon in this case.
  • I don’t like that they use “your site.” It is so vague that they could come back and use it in any way that they want.
blog comments powered by Disqus